Saturday, January 3, 2009

The Fed's Battle Plan



The Federal Reserve has learned from the past and is taking on the current economic crisis in an aggressive fashion. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is one of the nation's foremost scholars on the Great Depression and is using his expertise to head off the threat of deflation. The fear on the flipside is inflation. All the extra liquidity being pumped into the system may cause inflation to spike as the economy comes out of the current recession. While this is a legitimate fear, pulling the economy out of the current crisis is what is necessary in the short run.

Here's what Business Week has to say out the Fed's current battle plan:

Will the new battle plan work? Most likely yes—eventually. The Fed's monetary weaponry, in combination with the fiscal artillery of the incoming Obama Administration, are so potent that if they are used to their full extent they can almost certainly generate an economic recovery, potentially starting in the second half of 2009. The problem is that today's all-out attack on recession may well generate a surge of unwanted inflation in 2010 or after. But the Fed seems to regard that as an acceptable price to pay to avoid disaster now...

Most economists think that inflation is the last thing the Fed needs to worry about right now. According to New York University economist Mark L. Gertler, who collaborated with Bernanke on research during the Fed chief's Princeton years: "We are in an incredibly dangerous situation. Now is the time to be aggressive. There's no danger of inflation. It's almost insane that people are talking about it now." Even with all the Fed's heroic measures, predicts Merrill Lynch (MER) senior economist Drew Matus, "the recession is going to be a long one, and the recovery is not going to be a big one."

One reason for optimism—mild optimism, anyway—is that Bernanke has learned from the mistakes committed by the Fed during the Depression and the Bank of Japan during that nation's Lost Decade of the 1990s. In 1999, when he could afford to be undiplomatic, Bernanke asked in a book he contributed to whether Japan's monetary policy was "a case of self-induced paralysis," and he praised President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "willingness to be aggressive and to experiment."

1 comment:

Greg Pratt said...

Plans . . . I can't help but think of Hayek when I see the application of planning by the political sphere to the economic sphere.

With that in mind, the following link seems appropriate - I recommend clicking through to seeing what Thomas Sowell has to say.

Barack Obama and The Fatal Conceit
This post was written by Greg Ransom on July 30, 2009
Posted Under: Fatal Conceit

A quick google of “Obama” and “fatal conceit” harvests over 16,000 links. The interpretation of Barack Obama and his government as an instantiation of what Friedrich Hayek examined in his classic book The Fatal Conceit has become one of the dominant narratives of today. In May John Stossel wrote a widely circulated piece on the topic. This week, Thomas Sowell weighs in. So does Sheldon Richman. And also Ralph Reiland. I’m guessing we’ll be hearing more about this over the next month and year.

http://hayekcenter.org/?p=1478